Beta: this site is being tested and its figures are under review.

West Sussex Healthy Places

Chichester

Local authority district in West Sussex · 21 wards

Map showing where Chichester is in West Sussex

Context

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Average IMD score

Chichester: 15.6. This is higher than West Sussex (14.8) but lower than England (21.8). A lower figure is better.

Average IMD score, by ward. Darker shading means a higher figure.

  • Under 10
  • 10 to under 15
  • 15 to under 20
  • 20 to under 30
  • 30 and over
  • Approximate figure
Chichester Central: 13.8 Chichester East: 24.9 Chichester North: 11.6 Chichester South: 17.3 Chichester West: 14.8 Easebourne: 12.2 Fernhurst: 10.9 Fittleworth: 15.3 Goodwood: 19.5 Harbour Villages: 8.5 Harting: 18.7 Lavant: 20.0 Loxwood: 14.8 Midhurst: 14.2 North Mundham & Tangmere: 19.4 Petworth: 19.6 Selsey South: 19.3 Sidlesham with Selsey North: 19.2 Southbourne: 11.7 The Witterings: 14.2 Westbourne: 18.9
Map of average IMD score for the 21 wards in Chichester. The same figures are in the table of wards below.

% of residents living in England's most deprived 20% of neighbourhoods

Chichester: 0.0%. This is lower than West Sussex (2.5%) and England (20.1%). A lower figure is better.

Rank of average IMD score (1 = most deprived)

Chichester ranks 191st of 296 local authority districts in England.

Compare all areas for index of multiple deprivation →

Period: 2025. Data: MHCLG, English Indices of Deprivation 2025. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, English Indices of Deprivation 2025. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ward values use ONS geography lookups: Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show index of multiple deprivation as a table
Index of Multiple Deprivation, 2025
Area Average IMD score% of residents living in England's most deprived 20% of neighbourhoodsRank of average IMD score (1 = most deprived)
Chichester 15.6 0.0% 191st of 296
West Sussex 14.8 2.5% 128th of 153
England 21.8 20.1% Not ranked

Wards in Chichester

Ward Average IMD score% of residents living in England's most deprived 20% of neighbourhoods
Chichester Central 13.8 0.0%
Chichester East 24.9 0.0%
Chichester North 11.6 0.0%
Chichester South 17.3 0.0%
Chichester West 14.8 0.0%
Easebourne 12.2 0.0%
Fernhurst 10.9 0.0%
Fittleworth 15.3 0.0%
Goodwood 19.5 0.0%
Harbour Villages 8.5 0.0%
Harting 18.7 0.0%
Lavant 20.0 0.0%
Loxwood 14.8 0.0%
Midhurst 14.2 0.0%
North Mundham & Tangmere 19.4 0.0%
Petworth 19.6 0.0%
Selsey South 19.3 0.0%
Sidlesham with Selsey North 19.2 0.0%
Southbourne 11.7 0.0%
The Witterings 14.2 0.0%
Westbourne 18.9 0.0%

Ward figures are estimated from neighbourhood data. * Approximate: the ward’s boundary does not match neighbourhood boundaries well. Why some ward figures are approximate.

Population aged 65 and over

% of residents aged 65 and over

Chichester: 27.7%. This is higher than West Sussex (23.3%), the South East (19.8%) and England (18.7%).

% of residents aged 65 and over, by ward. Darker shading means a higher figure.

  • Under 15%
  • 15% to under 20%
  • 20% to under 25%
  • 25% to under 30%
  • 30% and over
Chichester Central: 33.7% Chichester East: 18.9% Chichester North: 27.1% Chichester South: 20.9% Chichester West: 24.5% Easebourne: 31.1% Fernhurst: 24.3% Fittleworth: 33.8% Goodwood: 25.1% Harbour Villages: 28.9% Harting: 29.5% Lavant: 30.5% Loxwood: 26.5% Midhurst: 31.4% North Mundham & Tangmere: 18.5% Petworth: 32.2% Selsey South: 39.0% Sidlesham with Selsey North: 34.8% Southbourne: 24.2% The Witterings: 33.9% Westbourne: 28.2%
Map of % of residents aged 65 and over for the 21 wards in Chichester. The same figures are in the table of wards below.

Compare all areas for population aged 65 and over →

Period: mid-2024. Data: ONS, Small area population estimates (2021-based), mid-year. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show population aged 65 and over as a table
Population aged 65 and over, mid-2024
Area % of residents aged 65 and over
Chichester 27.7%
West Sussex 23.3%
South East 19.8%
England 18.7%

Wards in Chichester

Ward % of residents aged 65 and over
Chichester Central 33.7%
Chichester East 18.9%
Chichester North 27.1%
Chichester South 20.9%
Chichester West 24.5%
Easebourne 31.1%
Fernhurst 24.3%
Fittleworth 33.8%
Goodwood 25.1%
Harbour Villages 28.9%
Harting 29.5%
Lavant 30.5%
Loxwood 26.5%
Midhurst 31.4%
North Mundham & Tangmere 18.5%
Petworth 32.2%
Selsey South 39.0%
Sidlesham with Selsey North 34.8%
Southbourne 24.2%
The Witterings 33.9%
Westbourne 28.2%

Life expectancy at birth

Life expectancy at birth: females

Chichester: 85.3 years (95% confidence interval 84.7 to 85.8). This is better than England (83.5). It is higher than West Sussex (84.6) and the South East (84.5).

Life expectancy at birth: males

Chichester: 80.4 years (95% confidence interval 79.8 to 81.0). This is better than England (79.7). It is lower than West Sussex (80.8) and the South East (80.8).

Compare all areas for life expectancy at birth →

Period: 2023–25. Data: OHID, Fingertips Public Health Outcomes Framework (A01b), using ONS life expectancy for local areas. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Fingertips (Public Health Outcomes Framework), based on Office for National Statistics data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show life expectancy at birth as a table
Life expectancy at birth, 2023–25
Area Life expectancy at birth: femalesLife expectancy at birth: males
Chichester 85.3 80.4
West Sussex 84.6 80.8
South East 84.5 80.8
England 83.5 79.7

Neighbourhood design

Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH) overall index

Please note: AHAH combines distances to services, nearby retail such as fast food and gambling, green and blue space, and air pollution into a single index. Ranks are relative to all neighbourhoods in Great Britain.

% of residents in Great Britain's least healthy 20% of neighbourhoods

Chichester: 5.6%. This is lower than West Sussex (6.2%), the South East (12.7%) and England (24.4%). A lower figure is better.

Compare all areas for access to healthy assets and hazards (ahah) overall index →

Period: 2026 (v5.1). Data: Geographic Data Service (University of Liverpool), Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH) v5.1. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Geographic Data Service (University of Liverpool), Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH) v5.1, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Daras, K., Green, M.A., Davies, A., Barr, B. and Singleton, A. (2019) Open data on health-related neighbourhood features in Great Britain. Scientific Data 6, 107. Funded by Smart Data Research UK. Residents: Office for National Statistics small area population estimates (mid-2024), OGL v3.0.

Show access to healthy assets and hazards (ahah) overall index as a table
Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH) overall index, 2026 (v5.1)
Area % of residents in Great Britain's least healthy 20% of neighbourhoods
Chichester 5.6%
West Sussex 6.2%
South East 12.7%
England 24.4%

Wards in Chichester

Ward % of residents in Great Britain's least healthy 20% of neighbourhoods
Chichester Central 0.0%
Chichester East 0.0%
Chichester North 0.0%
Chichester South 0.0%
Chichester West 0.0%
Easebourne 0.0%
Fernhurst 0.0%
Fittleworth 0.0%
Goodwood 53.3%
Harbour Villages 0.0%
Harting 61.0%
Lavant 0.0%
Loxwood 21.0%
Midhurst 0.0%
North Mundham & Tangmere 0.0%
Petworth 0.0%
Selsey South 0.0%
Sidlesham with Selsey North 0.0%
Southbourne 0.0%
The Witterings 0.0%
Westbourne 35.6%

Ward figures are estimated from neighbourhood data. * Approximate: the ward’s boundary does not match neighbourhood boundaries well. Why some ward figures are approximate.

Housing

Fuel poverty

Please note: These are modelled estimates. The government advises using them to spot areas of particularly high or low fuel poverty, not to compare areas with similar levels.

% of households in fuel poverty

Chichester: 9.5%. This is higher than West Sussex (7.9%) and the South East (8.2%) but lower than England (9.9%). A lower figure is better.

% of households in fuel poverty, by ward. Darker shading means a higher figure.

  • Under 6%
  • 6% to under 8%
  • 8% to under 10%
  • 10% to under 12%
  • 12% and over
  • Approximate figure
Chichester Central: 9.0% Chichester East: 9.9% Chichester North: 7.2% Chichester South: 8.8% Chichester West: 8.2% Easebourne: 13.5% Fernhurst: 9.6% Fittleworth: 14.2% Goodwood: 13.7% Harbour Villages: 7.4% Harting: 14.9% Lavant: 10.1% Loxwood: 11.2% Midhurst: 10.3% North Mundham & Tangmere: 7.3% Petworth: 14.5% Selsey South: 7.6% Sidlesham with Selsey North: 8.7% Southbourne: 7.8% The Witterings: 7.5% Westbourne: 12.2%
Map of % of households in fuel poverty for the 21 wards in Chichester. The same figures are in the table of wards below.

Compare all areas for fuel poverty →

Period: 2024. Data: DESNZ, Sub-regional fuel poverty data 2026 (2024 data). Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Sub-regional fuel poverty statistics. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show fuel poverty as a table
Fuel poverty, 2024
Area % of households in fuel poverty
Chichester 9.5%
West Sussex 7.9%
South East 8.2%
England 9.9%

Wards in Chichester

Ward % of households in fuel poverty
Chichester Central 9.0%
Chichester East 9.9%
Chichester North 7.2%
Chichester South 8.8%
Chichester West 8.2%
Easebourne 13.5%
Fernhurst 9.6%
Fittleworth 14.2%
Goodwood 13.7%
Harbour Villages 7.4%
Harting 14.9%
Lavant 10.1%
Loxwood 11.2%
Midhurst 10.3%
North Mundham & Tangmere 7.3%
Petworth 14.5%
Selsey South 7.6%
Sidlesham with Selsey North 8.7%
Southbourne 7.8%
The Witterings 7.5%
Westbourne 12.2%

Ward figures are estimated from neighbourhood data. * Approximate: the ward’s boundary does not match neighbourhood boundaries well. Why some ward figures are approximate.

Overcrowded households

% of households with fewer bedrooms than they need

Chichester: 1.9%. This is lower than West Sussex (3.0%), the South East (3.4%) and England (4.4%). A lower figure is better.

% of households with fewer bedrooms than they need, by ward. Darker shading means a higher figure.

  • Under 2%
  • 2% to under 3%
  • 3% to under 4%
  • 4% to under 6%
  • 6% and over
Chichester Central: 2.2% Chichester East: 3.4% Chichester North: 1.8% Chichester South: 2.5% Chichester West: 2.3% Easebourne: 0.4% Fernhurst: 1.4% Fittleworth: 0.8% Goodwood: 1.6% Harbour Villages: 1.7% Harting: 1.3% Lavant: 1.9% Loxwood: 1.6% Midhurst: 1.4% North Mundham & Tangmere: 2.6% Petworth: 2.2% Selsey South: 2.2% Sidlesham with Selsey North: 2.2% Southbourne: 1.2% The Witterings: 1.7% Westbourne: 2.1%
Map of % of households with fewer bedrooms than they need for the 21 wards in Chichester. The same figures are in the table of wards below.

Compare all areas for overcrowded households →

Period: 2021. Data: ONS, Census 2021. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Office for National Statistics, Census 2021, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show overcrowded households as a table
Overcrowded households, 2021
Area % of households with fewer bedrooms than they need
Chichester 1.9%
West Sussex 3.0%
South East 3.4%
England 4.4%

Wards in Chichester

Ward % of households with fewer bedrooms than they need
Chichester Central 2.2%
Chichester East 3.4%
Chichester North 1.8%
Chichester South 2.5%
Chichester West 2.3%
Easebourne 0.4%
Fernhurst 1.4%
Fittleworth 0.8%
Goodwood 1.6%
Harbour Villages 1.7%
Harting 1.3%
Lavant 1.9%
Loxwood 1.6%
Midhurst 1.4%
North Mundham & Tangmere 2.6%
Petworth 2.2%
Selsey South 2.2%
Sidlesham with Selsey North 2.2%
Southbourne 1.2%
The Witterings 1.7%
Westbourne 2.1%

Ward figures are built from Census output areas.

Food environment

Fast-food outlet density

Please note: Counts are premises registered with councils as takeaways or sandwich shops, per 100,000 people who live in the area. Town-centre wards with few residents can have very high figures because takeaways serve shoppers and workers too. Premises run from homes are counted for their district but cannot be placed in a ward.

Takeaways and sandwich shops per 100,000 residents

Chichester: 51.2. This is lower than West Sussex (60.1), the South East (64.6) and England (88.6). A lower figure is better.

Takeaways and sandwich shops per 100,000 residents, by ward. Darker shading means a higher figure.

  • Under 20
  • 20 to under 40
  • 40 to under 60
  • 60 to under 100
  • 100 and over
Chichester Central: 653.8 Chichester East: 58.2 Chichester North: 0.0 Chichester South: 13.7 Chichester West: 25.2 Easebourne: 0.0 Fernhurst: 29.0 Fittleworth: 0.0 Goodwood: 0.0 Harbour Villages: 18.2 Harting: 28.4 Lavant: 0.0 Loxwood: 0.0 Midhurst: 54.1 North Mundham & Tangmere: 0.0 Petworth: 28.6 Selsey South: 162.8 Sidlesham with Selsey North: 80.2 Southbourne: 11.8 The Witterings: 87.3 Westbourne: 29.5
Map of takeaways and sandwich shops per 100,000 residents for the 21 wards in Chichester. The same figures are in the table of wards below.

Compare all areas for fast-food outlet density →

Period: September 2026. Data: Food Standards Agency, Food Hygiene Rating Scheme. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Food Standards Agency, Food Hygiene Rating Scheme. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Residents: Office for National Statistics small area population estimates (mid-2024), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show fast-food outlet density as a table
Fast-food outlet density, September 2026
Area Takeaways and sandwich shops per 100,000 residents
Chichester 51.2
West Sussex 60.1
South East 64.6
England 88.6

Wards in Chichester

Ward Takeaways and sandwich shops per 100,000 residents
Chichester Central 653.8
Chichester East 58.2
Chichester North 0.0
Chichester South 13.7
Chichester West 25.2
Easebourne 0.0
Fernhurst 29.0
Fittleworth 0.0
Goodwood 0.0
Harbour Villages 18.2
Harting 28.4
Lavant 0.0
Loxwood 0.0
Midhurst 54.1
North Mundham & Tangmere 0.0
Petworth 28.6
Selsey South 162.8
Sidlesham with Selsey North 80.2
Southbourne 11.8
The Witterings 87.3
Westbourne 29.5

Year 6 obesity (incl. severe obesity)

Please note: Ward figures are based on small numbers of children (about 190 per ward over three school years), so their confidence intervals are wide. Compare wards using the ‘Better / Similar / Worse than England’ labels rather than small differences in the figures.

% of Year 6 children living with obesity

Chichester: 18.4% (95% confidence interval 17.0% to 19.7%). This is better than England (22.3%). It is lower than West Sussex (18.5%) and the South East (19.3%).

% of Year 6 children living with obesity, by ward. Darker shading means a higher figure.

  • Under 12%
  • 12% to under 16%
  • 16% to under 20%
  • 20% to under 24%
  • 24% and over
  • Not published
Chichester Central: not published Chichester East: 25.8% Chichester North: 23.3% Chichester South: 22.2% Chichester West: 21.4% Easebourne: not published Fernhurst: 11.1% Fittleworth: 18.2% Goodwood: 19.0% Harbour Villages: 12.7% Harting: 16.7% Lavant: 16.7% Loxwood: 19.4% Midhurst: 17.1% North Mundham & Tangmere: 22.8% Petworth: 25.0% Selsey South: 14.8% Sidlesham with Selsey North: 19.4% Southbourne: 16.7% The Witterings: 18.4% Westbourne: 12.5%
Map of % of Year 6 children living with obesity for the 21 wards in Chichester. The same figures are in the table of wards below.

Compare all areas for year 6 obesity (incl. severe obesity) →

Period: 2022/23–24/25. Data: OHID, National Child Measurement Programme via Fingertips. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Fingertips, based on the National Child Measurement Programme (NHS England). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show year 6 obesity (incl. severe obesity) as a table
Year 6 obesity (incl. severe obesity), 2022/23–24/25
Area % of Year 6 children living with obesity
Chichester 18.4%
West Sussex 18.5%
South East 19.3%
England 22.3%

Wards in Chichester

Ward % of Year 6 children living with obesity
Chichester Central Not published
Chichester East 25.8%
Chichester North 23.3%
Chichester South 22.2%
Chichester West 21.4%
Easebourne Not published
Fernhurst 11.1%
Fittleworth 18.2%
Goodwood 19.0%
Harbour Villages 12.7%
Harting 16.7%
Lavant 16.7%
Loxwood 19.4%
Midhurst 17.1%
North Mundham & Tangmere 22.8%
Petworth 25.0%
Selsey South 14.8%
Sidlesham with Selsey North 19.4%
Southbourne 16.7%
The Witterings 18.4%
Westbourne 12.5%

Natural environment

Mortality attributable to particulate air pollution

Please note: These are modelled estimates of the share of deaths among adults aged 30 and over linked to long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5). They are not counts of deaths caused by air pollution.

% of adult deaths linked to fine particulate air pollution

Chichester: 4.5%. This is lower than West Sussex (4.9%), the South East (5.1%) and England (5.3%). A lower figure is better.

Compare all areas for mortality attributable to particulate air pollution →

Period: 2024. Data: OHID, Fingertips Public Health Outcomes Framework. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Fingertips (Public Health Outcomes Framework), based on UK Health Security Agency and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs modelling. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show mortality attributable to particulate air pollution as a table
Mortality attributable to particulate air pollution, 2024
Area % of adult deaths linked to fine particulate air pollution
Chichester 4.5%
West Sussex 4.9%
South East 5.1%
England 5.3%

Access to green and blue space (AHAH domain)

Please note: AHAH combines distances to services, nearby retail such as fast food and gambling, green and blue space, and air pollution into a single index. Ranks are relative to all neighbourhoods in Great Britain.

% of residents in Great Britain's worst 20% of neighbourhoods for green and blue space

Chichester: 14.5%. This is lower than West Sussex (16.8%), the South East (19.7%) and England (22.9%). A lower figure is better.

Compare all areas for access to green and blue space (ahah domain) →

Period: 2026 (v5.1). Data: Geographic Data Service (University of Liverpool), Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH) v5.1. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Geographic Data Service (University of Liverpool), Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards (AHAH) v5.1, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Daras, K., Green, M.A., Davies, A., Barr, B. and Singleton, A. (2019) Open data on health-related neighbourhood features in Great Britain. Scientific Data 6, 107. Funded by Smart Data Research UK. Residents: Office for National Statistics small area population estimates (mid-2024), OGL v3.0.

Show access to green and blue space (ahah domain) as a table
Access to green and blue space (AHAH domain), 2026 (v5.1)
Area % of residents in Great Britain's worst 20% of neighbourhoods for green and blue space
Chichester 14.5%
West Sussex 16.8%
South East 19.7%
England 22.9%

Wards in Chichester

Ward % of residents in Great Britain's worst 20% of neighbourhoods for green and blue space
Chichester Central 0.0%
Chichester East 0.0%
Chichester North 20.8%
Chichester South 0.0%
Chichester West 58.7%
Easebourne 0.0%
Fernhurst 0.0%
Fittleworth 0.0%
Goodwood 53.3%
Harbour Villages 0.0%
Harting 61.0%
Lavant 47.2%
Loxwood 0.0%
Midhurst 0.0%
North Mundham & Tangmere 0.0%
Petworth 0.0%
Selsey South 0.0%
Sidlesham with Selsey North 41.2%
Southbourne 15.2%
The Witterings 16.8%
Westbourne 35.6%

Ward figures are estimated from neighbourhood data. * Approximate: the ward’s boundary does not match neighbourhood boundaries well. Why some ward figures are approximate.

Transport and active travel

Active travel to work

Please note: Census 2021 took place during COVID-19 restrictions, when many people worked from home. These figures show how people travelled to work in March 2021 and may not reflect usual patterns.

% of people travelling to work who walked or cycled

Chichester: 18.5%. This is higher than West Sussex (14.6%), the South East (14.9%) and England (14.2%). A higher figure is better.

% of people travelling to work who walked or cycled, by ward. Darker shading means a higher figure.

  • Under 8%
  • 8% to under 12%
  • 12% to under 16%
  • 16% to under 24%
  • 24% and over
Chichester Central: 39.5% Chichester East: 39.0% Chichester North: 29.5% Chichester South: 30.9% Chichester West: 28.6% Easebourne: 11.7% Fernhurst: 9.4% Fittleworth: 12.4% Goodwood: 12.9% Harbour Villages: 12.5% Harting: 6.9% Lavant: 8.6% Loxwood: 6.8% Midhurst: 13.4% North Mundham & Tangmere: 11.8% Petworth: 16.9% Selsey South: 17.2% Sidlesham with Selsey North: 14.8% Southbourne: 25.8% The Witterings: 12.6% Westbourne: 10.6%
Map of % of people travelling to work who walked or cycled for the 21 wards in Chichester. The same figures are in the table of wards below.

% of working residents working mainly at or from home

Chichester: 34.4%. This is higher than West Sussex (33.3%) and England (31.5%) but lower than the South East (35.8%).

Compare all areas for active travel to work →

Period: 2021. Data: ONS, Census 2021 method used to travel to work. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Office for National Statistics, Census 2021, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show active travel to work as a table
Active travel to work, 2021
Area % of people travelling to work who walked or cycled% of working residents working mainly at or from home
Chichester 18.5% 34.4%
West Sussex 14.6% 33.3%
South East 14.9% 35.8%
England 14.2% 31.5%

Wards in Chichester

Ward % of people travelling to work who walked or cycled% of working residents working mainly at or from home
Chichester Central 39.5% 32.4%
Chichester East 39.0% 22.5%
Chichester North 29.5% 33.8%
Chichester South 30.9% 26.2%
Chichester West 28.6% 30.6%
Easebourne 11.7% 44.1%
Fernhurst 9.4% 48.1%
Fittleworth 12.4% 43.8%
Goodwood 12.9% 35.5%
Harbour Villages 12.5% 37.9%
Harting 6.9% 44.7%
Lavant 8.6% 40.4%
Loxwood 6.8% 46.3%
Midhurst 13.4% 30.6%
North Mundham & Tangmere 11.8% 28.4%
Petworth 16.9% 30.0%
Selsey South 17.2% 27.6%
Sidlesham with Selsey North 14.8% 26.7%
Southbourne 25.8% 33.5%
The Witterings 12.6% 34.8%
Westbourne 10.6% 37.8%

Ward figures are built from Census output areas.

Physically active adults

Please note: These are estimates from a survey of about 400 adults in each district, so small differences between areas may not be meaningful. The confidence interval shows the likely range.

% of adults doing at least 150 minutes of moderate activity a week

Chichester: 80.2% (95% confidence interval 76.1% to 84.3%). This is better than England (68.0%). It is higher than West Sussex (70.6%) and the South East (70.9%).

Compare all areas for physically active adults →

Period: 2024/25. Data: OHID / Sport England, Active Lives Adult Survey via Fingertips. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Fingertips (Public Health Outcomes Framework), based on Sport England's Active Lives Adult Survey. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show physically active adults as a table
Physically active adults, 2024/25
Area % of adults doing at least 150 minutes of moderate activity a week
Chichester 80.2%
West Sussex 70.6%
South East 70.9%
England 68.0%

Households with no car or van

% of households with no car or van

Chichester: 14.1%. This is lower than West Sussex (16.0%), the South East (16.9%) and England (23.5%).

% of households with no car or van, by ward. Darker shading means a higher figure.

  • Under 10%
  • 10% to under 15%
  • 15% to under 20%
  • 20% to under 25%
  • 25% and over
Chichester Central: 42.6% Chichester East: 29.7% Chichester North: 16.6% Chichester South: 23.1% Chichester West: 21.0% Easebourne: 7.5% Fernhurst: 7.3% Fittleworth: 5.6% Goodwood: 8.8% Harbour Villages: 8.7% Harting: 8.2% Lavant: 9.0% Loxwood: 5.4% Midhurst: 12.8% North Mundham & Tangmere: 10.2% Petworth: 11.7% Selsey South: 16.1% Sidlesham with Selsey North: 15.7% Southbourne: 13.1% The Witterings: 12.3% Westbourne: 8.6%
Map of % of households with no car or van for the 21 wards in Chichester. The same figures are in the table of wards below.

Compare all areas for households with no car or van →

Period: 2021. Data: ONS, Census 2021 car or van availability. Retrieved 30 September 2026. Source: Office for National Statistics, Census 2021, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Show households with no car or van as a table
Households with no car or van, 2021
Area % of households with no car or van
Chichester 14.1%
West Sussex 16.0%
South East 16.9%
England 23.5%

Wards in Chichester

Ward % of households with no car or van
Chichester Central 42.6%
Chichester East 29.7%
Chichester North 16.6%
Chichester South 23.1%
Chichester West 21.0%
Easebourne 7.5%
Fernhurst 7.3%
Fittleworth 5.6%
Goodwood 8.8%
Harbour Villages 8.7%
Harting 8.2%
Lavant 9.0%
Loxwood 5.4%
Midhurst 12.8%
North Mundham & Tangmere 10.2%
Petworth 11.7%
Selsey South 16.1%
Sidlesham with Selsey North 15.7%
Southbourne 13.1%
The Witterings 12.3%
Westbourne 8.6%

Ward figures are built from Census output areas.

About these figures

Figures for Chichester are compared with West Sussex and England. Comparisons say whether a figure is higher or lower; they do not say whether a difference is statistically significant. Ward maps and tables show the 21 wards in Chichester, using the May 2025 ward boundaries.

How the figures are produced.

District code: E07000225.

Wards in Chichester